Categories
Featured

Themed residence program expanded to include small houses downtown

By Allison Mongan

Writer

Next fall, four small houses on the downhill part of campus will become themed student residences.

Students applied this spring to live in Edwards House, Hulley House, Galloway House or 23 University Ave and make the house a themed residence depending on their specific interests. Applications were due at the start of this week and a panel will choose from the applicants and make the decision by next Monday so that the students who do not get it can be eligible for the lottery number housing process.

“Themes will change from year to year depending on what group will be living in the house,” said Grant Hoover, assistant director of residential education for diverse communities.

Each of the four small houses will be open to any students that are able to fill them. The house sizes range from 12 to 28 persons able to live there, and the applicants had to be able to fill the entire house in order to apply.

Each applicant group had to determine their specific theme and explain why they wanted to have a house dedicated to their specific topic.

“Living on hall with people of similar interests has been very cool and it is nice to have that strong common thread. This program is great because it gives this unique opportunity to more students on campus,” Isabelle Catalano ’12 said.

Next year all small houses will be required to have one campus-wide program and one community service program, in addition to at least two other programs over the course of the school year. Every house will also have a faculty or staff member who will serve as an adviser and who will attend programs and interact with the residents. The adviser component is to help strengthen ties between students and the faculty and to help them build more personal relationships with each other.

“For the houses without resident assistants there will be house leaders. These leaders are in charge of meetings and programs and any administrative things,” Hoover said.

The Small House Program also includes the “Making a House a Home Program.” Student groups that continually occupy one specific house can apply for updates that can be made to the house. The Galloway House has been occupied by C.A.L.V.I.N. and H.O.B.B.E.S. for 13 years and has been able to apply for certain updates.

“Making a House a Home” includes being able to paint the interior and exterior after occupying the house for a set amount of years. C.A.L.V.I.N. and H.O.B.B.E.S. is a substance-free house and is one possible theme, among others, for a house next year.

Categories
Headline News

Senior gift installed in Elaine Langone Center

By Mike McPhee

Managing Editor

The class gift from this year’s outgoing seniors won’t be formally unveiled until a traditional champagne toast in April, but it is already attracting attention from students who pass through the new student lounge in the Elaine Langone Center (ELC) .

The Senior Class Congress brainstormed gift ideas and found inspiration in their three favorite gifts from past classes: the Christy Mathewson Gates, the bison statue outside the Kenneth Langone Athletics and Recreation Center (KLARC), and the basketball mural on the wall just inside the entrance of Sojka Pavilion. These ideas are incorporated into the mosaic they designed and purchased as their gift.

“The concept for the design was focused around our class motto, ‘Live with Integrity. Empower through Knowledge. Lead with Courage.’ We felt the Christy Mathewson Gates and the bison signified this. We feel like we entered the gates of knowledge during our freshman year orientation, Christy Mathewson was a man with great integrity that all Bucknellians should aspire to, and no animal leads with greater courage than a bison,” senior class president Matt Hotard ’11 said.

Many students can be seen peering over the caution tape surrounding the new mosaic, which is located in the floor on the ground floor of the ELC.

“I really like what the University did with the space, giving the students an area to gather, and I am especially glad that my class has added its own mark on it to show some Bucknell pride,” Adam Selby ’11 said.
Other students have mixed feelings about the choice of gift.
“I think that it’s really interesting and it expresses some very encouraging themes in its design. However, I would be more inclined to choose something that gives back to the campus in a more physical way. While this particular gift adds beauty to the new student center, their choice could have better reflected a material need for the college,” Sean Fortney ’12 said.

Hotard would like to thank Gretchen Heuges, the director of the Craft Center, senior class adviser Dean Kari Conrad and the members of the Senior Class Congress for their help with the planning and implementation of the mosaic.

Categories
Editorial Opinion

Editorial

Most people who attended the University’s annual First Night ceremony, held last Friday, agree that the event went well and that most first-year students who attended enjoyed it. However, although a majority of first-years went and enjoyed themselves, a significant proportion did not bother to go. Rooke Chapel was crowded, but not nearly as jam-packed as during Orientation, and many halls had at least a small group of students skip out on the ceremonies. Some of these absentees had legitimate excuses such as athletics commitments, but many students bypassed the tradition by choice because they were not interested in participating.

Students party every week, and it is upsetting that even a minority of first-years would rather spend an extra few hours doing so than participate in an important University tradition.

First Night is a ceremony that initiates first-years into the University’s alumni community; it also features the unveiling of the first-year class’s motto, colors and crest. Still, it was apparently unclear to many first-years going into the event why they should care about it. There was a noticeable lack of enthusiasm in the time leading up to the event, and expectations were low. Many students evidently decided that attending would not be worth their time.

These low expectations were at least partially a result of a failure to hype up the event sufficiently. The RAs and OAs of first-year halls and class representatives could have done more to get students excited, promoting the event further in advance and more clearly emphasizing why it would be enjoyable and worthwhile. If First Night had been portrayed as a bigger deal in the time leading up to the event, the students who declined to attend might have been more interested.

Still, it is sad that a major University tradition should need so much marketing and promotion just to sustain student interest. Even if First Night may not have been the most thrilling few hours of everyone’s college careers, it was certainly more memorable and meaningful than anything else that first-years were likely to have been doing on a Friday evening. Few students do homework or anything useful on Friday evenings, preferring to spend the time relaxing, socializing and preparing for parties. Although we could understand why students would want to have time to wind down after a busy week, First Night only happens once in a student’s time at the University, so students should have embraced it and looked forward to it, even if it cut into their normal routine.

In any case, First Night was over well before the night’s major parties began at 10 p.m., so it certainly did not prevent anyone from otherwise enjoying their Friday night. Even if the event was not as hyped up as it could have been, the blame for students’ reluctance to participate ultimately lies on them.

Categories
Uncategorized

Public Safety Log

Wednesday, Feb. 9

ALARM/INTRUSION

Purchasing: Employee activated.

ALARM/FIRE

Bucknell West: Caused by cooking.

HARASSMENT/COMMUNICATION

Trax Hall: Under investigation.

EMS TRANSPORT

Elaine Langone Center: Hospital transport.

DRUG VIOLATION

Larison Hall: Judicial referral.

Thursday, Feb. 10

SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY

McDonnell Hall: Unfounded.

Friday, Feb. 11

ALARM/FIRE

Financial Aid Office: Malfunctioning smoke detector.

THEFT

Elaine Langone Center: Under investigation.

DISORDERLY CONDUCT

Edwards House: Under investigation.

Saturday, Feb. 12

ALARM/FIRE

Bucknell West: Caused by dirty detector.

LIQUOR LAW VIOLATION

Bucknell West: Judicial referral.

ALARM/FIRE

Golf Course Clubhouse: Cause unknown.

ALARM/INTRUSION

Elaine Langone Center: Caused by employee.

DRUG LAW VIOLATION

Bucknell West: Judicial referral.

SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY

Gateways Parking Lot: Unfounded.

ALARM/FIRE

Bucknell West: Caused by cooking.

ALARM/FIRE

Bucknell West: Caused by curling iron.

LIQUOR LAW VIOLATION

Larison Hall: Judicial referral.

Sunday, Feb. 13

LIQUOR LAW VIOLATION

McDonnell Hall: Judicial referral.

CRIMINAL MISCHIEF

Harris Hall: Under investigation.

ASSIST/POLICE

Lewisburg Cemetary: Assist LPD.

Monday, Feb. 14

THEFT

Roberts Hall: Under investigation.

PROPERTY/FOUND

Off Campus: Report filed.

ALARM/FIRE

Dana Engineering Building: Caused by experiment.

Tuesday, Feb. 15

ALARM/FIRE

University Avenue: Caused by cooking.

DRUG VIOLATION

Trax Hall: Unfounded.

ALARM/FIRE

Bucknell West: Caused by cooking.

Categories
Opinion

Is Coors encouraging binge drinking?

By Elle Fried

Contributing Writer

According to many online sources, the Coors Brewing Company has confirmed that they will be releasing a new special can, crafted specifically for the purpose of shotgunning.

For those of you who are unaware of what shotgunning entails, it is the act of poking a hole in the side of a beer can (preferably with a key), slightly opening the tab on the top of the can and then drinking the beer out of the hole that was poked in on the side as fast as you can.

This new can will feature a second tab on the side of the can which will avoid the unruly cuts on fingers and lips that inevitably happen.

I am sure that the main criticism of this innovation is that it will encourage binge drinking, but the fact of the matter is that the majority of college kids know what shotgunning is and how to do it; therefore, I don’t believe it will encourage binge drinking and irresponsible behavior. This type of drinking is going to happen whether or not there is an extra tab to shotgun.

In fact, I believe it makes this act even safer. By avoiding the need to stab the can with a foreign object, it eliminates the likelihood of someone cutting or hurting oneself. Additionally, it would also prevent sharp edges from cutting the mouth, which could lead to severe infections.

Because shotgunning at times may be an unsafe action, there is no harm in helping them be a little bit safer. Coors is simply trying to assist drinkers with a college pastime that people of the legal drinking may or may not choose to engage in.

Categories
Opinion

Watson’s debut on ‘Jeopardy!’ raises more questions than answers

By Mike McPhee

Managing Editor

The game show “Jeopardy!” featured an unprecedented contestant this week: Watson, an IBM-created supercomputer with highly sophisticated software, competed against “Jeopardy!” superstars Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter in a trivia test of man versus machine. For a machine that was designed to win at trivia competitions, Watson’s performance generated more questions than answers.

The idea of a computer that plays “Jeopardy!” has drawn media attention back to the development of artificial intelligence, something that has been quietly worked on by computer scientists and engineers for years. How soon will it be before machines become smarter than humans? Is Watson the first step in that direction?

Watson’s “Jeopardy!” performance does not tell us much about that bigger picture. Its most strikingly “human” trait is that it is not perfect. Despite IBM’s four years of research and development, there were still some shortcomings to Watson’s “thought” processes that became obvious over the course of the three-day “Jeopardy!” special.

For example, on the second day of the showing, Watson got 24 of the 25 questions in Double Jeopardy right. When prompted with the Final Jeopardy question, “U.S. Cities: Its largest airport is named for a WWII hero. Its second largest is named after a WWII battle,” Watson answered “Toronto.” The studio audience was shocked that this supercomputer came up with an answer that was so obviously incorrect. Watson also had an odd tendency to end all of its Daily Double wagers with atypical amounts instead of a round multiple of $100.

Watson did win the competition on “Jeopardy!”  In fact, it earned more money than both Jennings and Rutter combined. But compare its success rate to other electronic devices you own. It wouldn’t be acceptable if your cell phone only answered 24 out of 25 of your phone calls, or if sometimes your computer misinterpreted what you clicked on screen. Watson’s algorithm needs to be further developed before it can be branched out to other applications.

Those potential applications are quite interesting. Watson’s technology could be used to replace jobs that are currently held by humans – for example, answering questions when you call a help number for a broken computer, or even conducting telemarketing more intelligently.

In addition, Watson is very good at taking vast quantities of data as an input, receiving a question and formulating a useful output; in this way, it could function as a more advanced form of a search engine for important data-intensive fields like medical research.

Before this can happen, work still needs to be done. The computers that Watson is built out of fill an entire room, draw an enormous amount of power and certainly are not cheap. It is definitely not cost-effective to use a Watson to replace a human at a job yet.

The real take-away message for people who watched the “Jeopardy!” special is not that we should “welcome our new computer overlords,” as Ken wrote during his Final Jeopardy answer on Wednesday. We should keep an eye on the developing technology of “deep thought” computer programs as enhancements to human intelligence, not replacements for it.

Categories
Letters to the Editor Opinion

Response to gun control article predictable and disturbing

To the editor:

I just opened up the editorial section of The Bucknellian and was humored by the lively response on the “Gun Policy” (“Tuscon tragedy shouldn’t affect gun control policy,” Feb. 2) by Alexander Riley to editorial writer Amanda Ayers. While the editorial opinion piece may have lacked pertinent details supporting the enforcement of existing gun laws as written, it nevertheless adequately supported the second amendment and the founders’ intentions. The response, on the other hand, while well intentioned, was an unfortunately predictable piece riddled (no pun intended) with holes, emotion and misguided logic.

Let us first start with the “obligatory” reference to the founders, who he wryly remarks “we are told liked guns.” While it is historically debatable what the founders’ personal likes and dislikes were, what is clear is that the “invitation to struggle” that became the U.S. Constitution was brilliantly framed to limit powers of each branch of government and, more profoundly, to outline protections of its citizenry by listing what a government writ large could not control. The Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers leading up to the Constitutional Convention clearly followed one key vanguard that was codified into law – an inherent and wise distrust of what often develops when centralized power devolves to tyranny over its citizenry. Mr. Riley accurately identifies social norms that did not track with later values in the 19th and 20th centuries, and they were rightly corrected through the amendment process. He incorrectly draws parallels that evolving social norms now must be aggressively applied to gun ownership, and that drafting additional laws to restrict lawful gun ownership is essential, presumably regardless of whether or not they progressively whittle away at a constitutional right with a clear endgame. The follow-up questions then become: is a deliberate journey to undermine the Second Amendment and slowly prevent lawful gun ownership by citizens the right path? Is private gun ownership in and of itself an outdated concept in the modern world? Ask the Korean-American business establishments during the L.A. riots or, perhaps more recently (albeit abroad), the Green movement in Iran what they think on this subject.

Mr. Riley also conveniently skips details in his argument, like the magazine bans that have occurred elsewhere, previous “assault-looking” weapons bans and other laws that have had in fact adverse impacts on crime; that cities with the most restrictive anti-gun laws like Washington D.C., Detroit and Los Angeles have experienced increases in gun violence when the “bad guys” became the only ones who are carrying them. Conversely, numerous other cities have experienced the reverse when concealed permits were increased.

The shooter in the Tucson tragedy, certifiably insane by any measure, was in fact already in violation of numerous gun laws already in place, and he will no doubt suffer the consequences for his actions. Yes, the “man” did do the action, and yes, a large clip enabled him to carry out this crime with ruthless efficiency and violence. What Mr. Riley omits is that someone of this mind, already in violation of the law, could and likely would have resorted to other measures such as a homemade bomb, an automobile, rat poison or any other imaginable means with equally deadly efficiency, precision and murderous results. Sociopaths do these things, hence the name, and a reactive and alarmist response (with a political agenda behind it) to such horrors makes for bad broad policy and further limits rights, like it or not Mr. Riley, that are in fact guaranteed under the Constitution. I wonder what Mr. Riley’s response would have been if a private citizen legally carrying a firearm had downed this sociopath, as has occurred at other crime scenes. No mind, he was on a roll. “The Germans were bombing Pearl Harbor,” as John Belushi so eloquently pointed out in “Animal House.”

Let us next look at the “more Americans died between 1965 and 2000 from firearm accidents than were killed in the entire duration of the Vietnam war” argument. Perhaps based on that we should outlaw cars, motorcycles, power tools and lawnmowers, which data show clearly have killed more Americans than either Vietnam or firearms. Perhaps the most disturbing remark of the response, however, was, “It is depressing to see how frequently, in this country where education levels are so high, and even in a university like this one where students must excel academically just to gain admission, the falsehoods of the extremist gun lobby are uncritically reiterated in this manner.” Translation: even though you must be “book smart” to get into a school of this caliber, you are nonetheless ignorant to disagree with me (in upholding the Constitution) … perhaps in time you will become more “enlightened” (as I am) and see the real truth someday as it is outlined in partisan writings of like-minded individuals. Wow, I guess those founders really didn’t know what they were up to.

Katherine Bourque

Categories
Opinion

Middle East protests cause domino effect

By Pranav Sehgal

Opinions Editor

Recently, there has been a great deal of upheaval in the Middle East centering on anti-government protesters clashing with police and government supporters.

Although the news has been inundated with news of protests all across North Africa and the Middle East, the unrest originally started in Tunisia, and like a domino effect it has reached to all corners of the region.

Tunisia is one of the more liberal countries in North Africa. While it has a large middle class, social norms and a large tourism industry, it had one of the most oppressive governments in which corruption was rampant to the point where it was crippling its economy.

In what became known as the Jasmine Revolution, masses of protesters took to the streets to oust authoritarian leader President Ben Ali, who had been in power for 23 years.

This event served as catalyst for revolts across the region, most noticeably in Egypt. Hundreds of thousands of protesters succeeded in leading a popular uprising, which ended the rule of another authoritarian leader in North Africa, President Hosni Mubarak. Similar to Ali, Mubarak had ruled Egypt under a strict policy system for approximately 30 years.

These uprisings have inspired the masses in Yemen, Bahrain, and are expected to continue in Algeria, as the Prime Minister has yet to lift a 19-year state of emergency.

It feels as if the conservative, authoritarian and, in many cases, corrupt governments of the Middle East are being turned on their heads. It does not take a scientist to determine that not only will these protests not stop until the people of their respective countries get the reforms they want, but these protests will also spread to other areas of the region and eventually to other areas of the globe.

These current actions have also re-inspired the Iranian opposition movement after a year and a half in hiatus. It is clear that these reform movements are gaining steam and popularity among the region’s youth.

Although these protests have yet to hit some of the Middle East’s ultra-conservative countries, like Saudi Arabia, it seems inevitable that it will hit the Islamic-centered Kingdom. Even though I may doubt the effectiveness of such revolts, I still believe that they are necessary in promoting dialogue and eventually affecting change in the areas of the world where reforms are vital.

Categories
News

Comprehensive fee increases next year

By Rob Duffy

Editor-in-Chief

The new comprehensive fee for the 2011-12 school year will be estimated at $54,240, the University announced in a letter sent to parents last week. This figure is comprised of $43,628 for tuition, an estimated $10,374 for room and board (which varies depending on the type of housing a student lives in) and $238 for additional fees. The total is up 3.7% from the current year’s estimated $52,280; according to the letter, this increase is the lowest at the University in the past ten years. More information will follow in next week’s edition of The Bucknellian.

Categories
Opinion

University’s attempts to halt binge drinking inadequate

By John Stevenson

Publication Designer

Within the next year, there is a high chance that a University student will lose his or her life to alcohol.

During the Greek Officer Orientation in January, President John Bravman and several other University administrators and alumni discussed ominous statistics from the fall semester: a 300-percent increase in the number of reported sexual assaults and 42 students hospitalized for alcohol-related issues. Of those students hospitalized, two experienced cardiac arrest. Yes, they were saved, but for some period of time, our classmates, our peers, were dead.

These issues—while a blight on campuses everywhere—have reached crisis proportions here.

Attempts to remedy the escalation of assaults come to campus in the form of marches, speakers and book groups—University students surely know there is a problem. The issues, however, will not be solved in these ways. Colossal problems must be solved in forceful ways. The University must put forth a comprehensive, unified and aggressive effort to mitigate sexual assaults and the related scourge, binge drinking.

To state the obvious: There is never any excuse for sexual assault. No one asks for it; no one deserves it. The damage is irreparable, and it is a pain which survivors carry for the entirety of their lives. If the survivor is comfortable with telling his or her friends and loved ones, the pain—while potentially easier to manage when shared—spreads. University students feel this weight in our own hearts because of our strong sense of community.

The sexual assault epidemic on campus is not rooted in a flawed mentality in men; it is prevalent because of a flawed mentality propagated in all students, faculty and staff—namely that somehow status quo responses will yield something other than the status quo. Buying thousands of blue-colored “For-a-Better-Bucknell” wristbands is wishfully and woefully inadequate; it is credulity to think otherwise.

We are all to blame.

The University has acted too passively. It has brought speakers, supported marches and gatherings, but these things will not solve the issue. Dr. Jackson Katz’s talk last week did little. Bringing a speaker is simply inadequate for the University to claim it is doing all it can to “fix” the problem.

Katz will not have that effect. The social issues he discussed may exist, but if these flaws are the only impetus to the violence, the sexual assault rate off campus would be the same as on campus. Cities would be trying to organize book groups to protect their citizenry. This is not happening. Clearly, there is a variable which makes this surge a “within-the-Bubble” issue. The difference is the misuse of alcohol.

Alcohol has a profound impact on the number of sexual assaults. Researchers report that roughly half of all sexual assaults involve perpetrators who have been drinking; in some studies that percentage soars to nearly 80 percent (Collins and Messerschmidt 1993, Abbey et al. 1994, Crowell and Burgess 1996). While by no means suggesting the survivor is responsible for the crime, studies indicate that roughly the same percentage of those individuals had also been consuming alcohol. In addition to contributing to the skyrocketing number of sexual assaults, alcohol’s widespread and flagrant abuse on campus is significantly increasing the likelihood of a student’s death. The pain caused by this would be immeasurable. If one member was lost, the entire school would ache.

It is simply inexcusable to allow alcohol abuse to continue on our campus. Students must be more proactive in helping their friends—not just in dealing with the aftermath of binge drinking, but also in stopping it in the first place. Such aid, however, will not be enough; it must be supplemented with support from the staff, faculty and administration.

True change must occur, and for it to succeed, listen to Dr. Katz’s words from over a week ago: This solution comes from “taking a stand and taking some risks.” These words were not spoken about students; they were spoken about our administration.

Staff and faculty of the University: Act. By all means, participate in the marches, the book talks. Tell your students of the risks. Even with these efforts, more must be done.

The University and Public Safety must no longer turn a blind eye to the binge drinking on campus, nor can they—or the local authorities—ignore the excessive drinking that happens in downtown houses leased to University students.

On campus, it is common to see Public Safety sitting in cars on Fraternity Road as hordes of students stumble in and out of fraternity houses hosting unregistered events. Officers, entire sororities do not live in one fraternity house, especially if they are seen serially staggering in on a Wednesday.

Again, this is not about a beer or two with your buddies, or moderate social drinking, or drinking responsibly. This is the kind of drinking that puts people in the hospital, or stops their hearts, or risks irreparable harm to the drinkers and the people around them.

If a fraternity flagrantly and frequently defies the rules or is routinely found in possession of too much alcohol for its events, punish it. Thoroughly search the venue if it wishes to hold an event, and discipline the fraternity if the search finds contraband. Let the punishment—especially for repeated violations—be meaningful.

Greek life is an integral part of the University experience. Dealing seriously with these issues is not hostile to Greek life or its principles—quite the opposite; our founders would wholeheartedly support action to uphold that which is right.

University students are favored to attend an institution that sincerely cares about its students. We are fortunate to have a well-trained and just Department of Public Safety. Most importantly, we are blessed to have one another, each of us part of a community that would do anything to keep a member from harm.

Now is the time for that. Now is the time for this campus to burst the binge-drinking bubble. Time to address this problem and the problems that stem from it, forcefully, fully, and like our lives depended on it.

Because they do.