Categories
Arts & Life

Uptown hosts wildly popular improv show

Anna Jones

Arts & Life Editor

Family Weekend consists of two days packed with all sorts of events around campus, but Uptown managed to host one of the most popular events of the weekend.

On Sept. 27, We Brake for Nobody, the University’s own comedy troupe, and Upright Citizens Brigade (UCB), a famous improvisational touring company, performed a hilarious show for over 200 people who were in attendance.

UCB is based out of New York City, but travels to many different locations throughout the country. Amy Poehler and Matt Besser are two notable previous members of the Upright Citizens Brigade.

“There was a lot of comedy about college life,” Uptown student manager Emilie Ratajczak ’15 said. “[Upright Citizens Brigade] was often interviewing the audience about college.”

Students and families attended the show, and many other people stopped to watch, even after Uptown ran out of room for guests. Though this improv show is not new to family weekend, this year’s event had a larger turnout compared to previous years.

“People definitely had a great time and were able to enjoy a fun show,” student manager Greta Savickaite ’15 said.  

As always, Uptown has a variety of events during October, including “Save Our Treasured Chests.” This activity will be held tomorrow at 9 p.m. and will celebrate Breast Cancer Awareness Month.  There will be snacks, crafts, and prizes, and “Pitch Perfect” will be screened during the event.

After Fall Break, look forward to the annual Oktoberfest Pub Night at Uptown and some karaoke toward the end of the month. Stop by the club for activities every weekend in October!

Categories
Arts & Life

Freshman actors perform hilarious spoof on classic novels

Anna Jones

Arts & Life Editor

This past weekend, parents and alumni were able to experience University students’ performance abilities.

On Sept. 27-28, theatre students graced Tustin Studio Theatre with “All the Great Books (Abridged).”  The show was a parody of many classic books, such as the “Iliad,” the “Odyssey,” and “War and Peace.” Actors explained these stories through spoofs like “The Idiodity,” and used characters from many different books to reenact “War and Peace.”

The performance involved 10 first-year actors who enjoyed their debut in college theatre. It was also an interactive show; the audience participated by acting as “students” to the actors’ “teacher,” and occasionally spoke to the actors during the show.

“All the Great Books (Abridged)” was chosen based on the popularity of “Shakespeare Abridged,” which was put on during Family Weekend last year. It also seemed relevant to an audience of University students and their families, who are all familiar with these famous classics. Logan Kauffeld ’15 directed the show.

“Logan is very funny and a very talented director,” participating actress Alex Golden ’17 said. “He … gave us some free reign to develop our characters and improvise … so it was a very cooperative experience.”

All first-years thoroughly enjoyed their first foray into the University’s theatre program.

“I couldn’t have asked for a better first experience … my cast mates were funny … and very supportive. Logan and … our stage manager knew exactly what they were doing … I just had a fantastic time,” Golden said.

Both Saturday performances sold out, so the audience was clearly just as excited as the actors.

The University’s theatre program is active all year long, so don’t miss any of the upcoming shows!

Categories
Opinion

University police are overwhelming campus

Colette Brottman

Writer

I am deeply concerned about the events downtown in the recent weeks. Last year, when I walked down St. Catherine’s during one weekend, I could hear the music booming in the houses, people singing to Taylor Swift or old 90s jams, and people moving along the streets. During the past two weekends, I walked down St. Catherine’s and felt nervous. There was no music, no people milling around, but rather there were police cars parked throughout the street, and policemen following me as I walked back to my room.

I have heard many stories in the past couple days about people being harassed by the Buffalo Valley Regional Police Department (BVRPD), and a tale about a questionable undercover policeman entering households hosting parties. I am gravely concerned that University students are unaware of their rights. I feel that the police are taking advantage of this lack of knowledge, and students are getting put in harm’s way.

There has been an increase in reported sexual assaults and hospitalizations for upperclassmen. I see two ways to look at this. The first is that there is a serious problem on campus that needs a solution. But the way the police and administration have dealt with the issue is inappropriate, and I am disappointed in the disconnect between students and the administration. As a member of the University I feel like my voice has been silenced, and the school I chose to attend is being taken away from me. The second way to look at these increases, though, is pride that students are finally doing the right thing by reporting assaults and calling for help. With the new amnesty policy, students are more comfortable calling for help, and with the hard work of various sexual abuse awareness groups, students feel more comfortable speaking up.

This University is my home, and in that home I have a voice. We all have a voice. I urge every member of this University to briefly review their rights, email University President John Bravman, and open up discussion about these issues. I am not denying that there is an alcohol abuse problem at the University, or on college campuses in general, but the way it has been dealt with in the last few weeks has been more harmful than beneficial. We should be concerned about the direction our school is headed, because I’m starting to feel like I’m living in George Orwell’s “1984.”

Categories
News

University to begin re-accreditation

Ethan Zubkoff and Jen Lassen

Assistant News Editor and Senior Writer

University Hosts Middle States Re-Accreditation Forum

The University hosted a forum on Sept. 24 to begin its re-accreditation process. At the forum, there was a presentation of the first draft of a self-study guide for its upcoming re-accreditation with the Middle States Commission on Higher Education.

“The self-study addresses Middle States’ 14 Standards of Excellence, with a special emphasis on the interaction between Bucknell’s residential nature and our academic mission,” Provost Mick Smyer said.

The self-study is also designed to assess the extent to which the University adheres to the characteristics of excellence outlined by the 14 Middle States Commission on Higher Education accreditation standards, Smyer said.

“For reference, in Middle States parlance, a ‘recommendation’ is binding and requires follow-up action from the University within the next five years. A ‘suggestion’ by contrast is an action that is strongly encouraged, but is not required,” Smyer said.

The reaccreditation process takes place once every 10 years with the goal of composing a document that not only meets the needs of the Middle States Commission but at the same serving as a valuable way to enlighten the University about the continuing institutional planning, change and growth, Smyer said.

“The self-study process gives Bucknell and Bucknellians a chance to reflect on our strengths and challenges as an institution and our goals for the next ten years,” Smyer said.

The self-study is also designed to advance the University’s strategic priorities to enhance its academic and residential relationship, assist in its long-term vision for growth, sustainability and development in higher education.

Over 60 faculty members, staff, and students, who broke into six working groups, created this self-study, which is chaired by Professor of German and Humanities Katie Faull and Professor of Physics Tom Solomon over a two-year period.

Just under 100 faculty members, staff, and students attended the forum, according to Smyer.

Categories
News

Arboretum in need of restoration

Copper Josephs

Contributing Writer

Several invasive plant species pose a threat to the University’s arboretum.

The Norway maple, Japanese knotweed, and Goutweed are all dangerous to the arboretum because they are able to out-compete native species, Associate Professor of Biology Mark Spiro said.  

“These invasive, exotic species have no natural enemies in the community, so they will continue to out-compete the native trees unless something is done,” Spiro said.

Soil erosion caused by facilities’ large lawn mowers is another issue facing the arboretum. The mowers cannot go up the steep areas of the arboretum without knocking off a layer of topsoil. This layer, called humus, is essential to sustaining healthy trees.

Spiro and others have been communicating with the Department of Facilities to isolate specific regions of the grove where grass will not be cut, so that the humus can aggregate.

“The Bucknell Arboretum has turned into a living lab that teaches students about invasive species and various sustainability methods used to keep native plants alive,” Spiro said.

Dates when faculty and staff can help out with the University’s Arboretum project will be announced soon.

“We need all the hands we can get with this project,” biology major Ray Schlitt ’15 said.

Schlitt has been working with Spiro since 2012, interning over the summer to assist in the rejuvenation of the arboretum.

“Based on the amount of rings that some of these trees have, you can date these trees back over 230 years,” Spiro said.

“These trees are an integral part to the Bucknell experience, and we should use the resources available to help preserve them,” Schlitt said.

Categories
Arts & Life

Breaking Bad finale deftly ties up loose ends

Ben Kaufman

Editor-in-chief

Vince Gilligan officially wins the award for the best show on television ever. After six years, five seasons, and countless freak-out moments, “Breaking Bad” has come to an end.

I’m sitting here, in shock, trying to put words together to describe how I feel about this episode, and I have no idea where to start.

Unsurprisingly, Gilligan and his team of masterful writers found a way to tie up basically every storyline. To start, we see how Walt even got to New Mexico (by stealing that car in the beginning). Then we see him go to Gretchen’s house. It’s a classic case of Walter White, disregarding all realistic social norms and invading someone’s house to deliver them millions of dollars in cash to give to Walter, Jr. (or Flynn, depending on how much you like Walter). In addition, the fact that he uses Jesse’s friends, Badger and Skinny Pete—who we haven’t seen in ages—to be hitmen is extreme, but well played on his part to make sure that Gretchen follows through.

We also see Walt finally use the ricin he took from his house in the beginning of the season. I don’t really think anyone is too surprised that he used it to kill Lydia, and this at least took her out of the picture for the rest of the episode.

Then, Marie warns Skyler that Walt is back. Little do we know, he is standing in her kitchen as she is on the phone. First, it’s interesting that Walt didn’t try to patch things up with Marie, considering he is basically the reason Hank is dead. I guess the writers didn’t find it necessary to patch that up, and the audience is going to be heartbroken about it. As Walt talks to Skyler, and he finally agrees that while his meth cooking empire started out with good intentions, as time went on, it diverted, and he did it for the power and the money. Thank God. Walt needed to realize that, so better late than never. After a final goodbye to Skyler and Holly, and watching Walter, Jr. (or Flynn) walk into the house, he then goes to see Todd and fights his gang.

Finally, we get to see who will live, who will be the victors of the series, and who will fall and die with the other characters. After Walt almost got shot in the head on the spot for knowing that Jesse was still alive, Jack and Todd bring Jesse in, and the games begin. As Jesse walks in, Walt tackles him while simultaneously pressing the button to open the trunk of his car, revealing a large machine gun that kills everyone around him, except Todd and Jack. In a matter of seconds, Jesse strangles Todd with the chains that he is currently entangled in, and Walt finishes off Jack by shooting him one more time. After that, we see one lone bullet in Walt’s stomach, leading to his inevitable doom as Jesse drives away.

As the camera fades away, the cops run in to find Walt dead on the ground by the meth lab he had helped create. The scene was incredibly well done, and it’s amazing how the writers were able to make the audience sympathize with Walt. Walt started out as a decently nice guy trying to help his family, and then did a complete 180 and became the drug lord of his meth empire. The unforgettable line, “I am the one who knocks,” is the prime example of how this is the case, proving how Walt has become this person with no remorse who only wants to be the best and will do anything to achieve it. It is understandable that Walt should be considered a bad person, to say the least. Despite his issues, I left the episode feeling sad for Walt. I guess I finally have come around, after he has made his peace with the important people in his life and is left to die.

The episode was incredibly well written, and each actor was able to capture the true emotion of the situation. I think we can all say we shed a tear or two at the end, not only because this great show ended, but because of how well it ended and how well everything was summed up. I’m thoroughly impressed and saddened to know that we will never get to see any member of the White family or anyone else from the “Breaking Bad” family again.

Here’s to you Gilligan, Bryan Cranston, and anyone else involved in “Breaking Bad.” You put on quite a show. I’m sure that people will still be talking about it in the years to come, and it will truly be missed.

Categories
Arts & Life

Interning in Edinburgh

Ben Kaufman

Editor-in-Chief

The phrase “so much to do, so little time” had never felt as true as it did this summer while interning at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in Scotland.

The Edinburgh Festival Fringe takes place in the month of August, and it is the largest arts festival in the world. It started in 1947, just after World War II, as a way to revitalize the culture in Europe and lift everyone’s spirits. What started out as less than 50 shows has now turned into a festival with over 2,500 shows and over 4,000 performances that occur at almost all times of the day. Many famous actors, including Mike Myers, Hugh Laurie, Caroline Rhea, and Alan Cumming, have performed at the Fringe.

I was in Edinburgh as part of the Business of the Arts Program, which is organized by the University of Edinburgh. It is an eight-week program with four weeks of business courses and then four weeks of an internship at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe.

The first month was jam-packed with my attempts to see all of the main tourist attractions. The two adventures that stand out the most were exploring Edinburgh Castle and climbing to the top of Arthur’s Seat, the largest mountain in Edinburgh. The castle is filled with rich Scottish history and culture that one can experience first hand by walking around the museums of the castle. The castle, built on top of a hill, gives great views of the entire city. I found my experience at Arthur’s Seat significant, because it was the first time I had been hiking in the longest time. Those who know me well know that I am the opposite of an outdoorsy person, so climbing Arthur’s Seat was a completely different experience for me; I will never forget the beautiful views. Being able to say that I was the tallest person in Edinburgh at one point is also pretty cool.

The second month was the internship at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. I was placed at a medium sized venue called Sweet Venues, which is a company based out of Dundee (about two hours away from Edinburgh). The venue was located in one of the highest traffic areas for visitors. I was doing press and marketing for them, helping out with their Facebook and Twitter pages, hanging up posters and flyers for the various shows at the venue, looking over press releases, and taking pictures for events. While the venue is medium sized, in terms of the number of shows they perform and the number of production companies that perform in their venue, the staff size is very small, with only 15 people employees.

With this tiny staff, one can imagine how chaotic the start of the internship was, especially setting up and bringing everything together in time for the festival’s start. While it was hectic, this internship was one of the most rewarding experiences that I have ever been a part of. It gave me an opportunity to meet many interesting people who I never would have met otherwise. The people who performed at Sweet Venues were not only from Scotland, but from places around the world, like Dallas, Texas, and Sydney, Australia. My position allowed me to be a part of really cool events, like a charity event that was held at a Bowling Club in Edinburgh.

From my fellow students in the program, to the people I worked with at Sweet Venues, everyone was incredibly welcoming to me and helped make my time in Edinburgh incredibly unique. Hopefully I can go back some day to expand on my experience abroad.

Categories
Arts & Life

Why I Want to Study Abroad Down Under: A Statement of Intent

Will Luckey

Writer

Why I Want to Study Abroad Down Under: A Statement of Intent

Dear Study Abroad Program,

I can’t think of another place I would want to spend my semester abroad other than Australia. In my mind, it is the only place for me. Ever since I was young, I dreamed of visiting the Oprah House in Sydney. I understand that it was built to look like the Superdome after Hurricane Katrina hit, or maybe they just never finished it—I am not sure.

Secondly, I would like to visit the place where “Finding Nemo” was filmed. I plan on retracing the journey the whiny, sourpuss fish did with that mentally handicapped one.

I will top off that day with a visit to an authentic Outback Steakhouse. I only hope my coupon for pepper-jack sliders does not expire before then!

I am a big fan of football, but I sometimes find all of the rules confusing. Plus, the uniforms seem a bit too baggy and constraining. I have done some research, and Aussie football rules seems much more up my alley. They wear tight short shorts and poorly cut tank tops. The game is basically running around with no organization, throwing the ball to other players until the game just kind of ends. There are goal posts, but they never seem to use them, and teams are awarded arbitrary amounts of points whenever they make the other team bleed.

Next, I will make a pilgrimage to the birthplace of my favorite actor, Russell Crowe. He has starred in some timeless classics such as “Mystery Alaska,” “3:10 To Yuma,” and the second season of “L.A. Confidential.” He is also featured on Australia’s $5 bill.

A few last things I want to do are find and devour the stingray that killed the Aussie version of Popeye, Jeff Corwin, hang out with Crocodile Dundee (who I believe is the current Prime Minister), get in a fight with a Tasmanian devil, panic the first time I see a toilet flush backwards, order shrimp on the barbie wherever I go, get filmed being attacked by a shark for “Shark Week,” make a rug out of a kangaroo (Kangarug), tell everyone how average of a beer Foster’s is, and that I still blame them for killing Jack’s dad in “Lost.”

I really love America, and I hate all people and things foreign to me. Similar to America, Australia values kicking natives off of their ancestral land and building sprawling metropolises in places with no sources of fresh water. I am looking forward to studying in a country founded by criminals whose national sport is swimming. In short, I just cannot wait to live on a desert island with less culture than Canada.

Please consider me for a spot in your program,

Will Luckey

Categories
Arts & Life

Joseph Gordon- Levitt proves himself as director

Carolyn Williams

Senior Writer

Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s directorial debut, “Don Jon,” is the story of a bridge-and-tunnel Lothario whose lady-killing routine is turned on its head when he meets his match in the bossy “dime” Barbara Sugarman, (played by a perfectly cast Scarlett Johansson).

Jon’s (Gordon-Levitt) prowess with women is legendary-his friends call him “the don.” He’s got a different girl each night, church on Sunday, and dinner after with his hilariously stereotyped New Jersey-Italian family. And this is the way Jon likes it. His mother bemoans his single status, but Jon’s list of priorities, repeated throughout the film as a mantra, is “my body, my ride, my pad, my church, my family, my boys, my girls, my porn.” And this is Jon’s problem: he likes the ladies (and they certainly like him), but unfortunately none of these real-life women have come close to the caricatured porn stars whom Jon has devoted years to enjoying. The moment he locks eyes with Barbara Sugarman, he finds himself to be the hunted instead of the hunter.

Jon and Barbara’s relationship progresses slowly—Barbara is the kind of girl who wants to meet the parents before she puts out—but when they eventually settle into a rhythm, the differences in their personalities quickly become evident. If Jon represents the classic, egotistical, male persona, reducing women to numerical scores and unable to understand the fundamental disconnect between porn and sex in real life, then Barbara embodies a complementary female character. Obsessed with romantic comedies and expecting her own life to resemble one, she sets about playing a parallel game to Jon’s: he’s trying to get into her pants; she’s trying to make him fit the mold of a Disney prince. Jon still can’t quit the porn, and this becomes the fundamental issue in their outwardly happy relationship.

Gordon-Levitt has amassed an all-star cast, and the movie has the feel of a project that was very fun to work on. Tony Danza and Glenne Headly typify the traditional husband/wife dynamic in their fits of exasperated screaming, momentarily contrasted with memories of their original romance. Brie Larson is hilarious as Jon’s detached younger sister, eyes glued to her smartphone, only speaking up once during the course of the whole film. Julianne Moore’s performance is equal parts fragile and comic, and interestingly, it’s only through this dichotomy that her character is able to see through Jon’s shellacked Guido persona to access the real person underneath.

“Don Jon” was originally titled “Don Jon’s Addiction” when it premiered at Sundance in January, but the more serious title was dumped for wide release. Similarly, audience members might miss Gordon-Levitt’s more subtle points behind its wickedly comic surface. It’s a smart and highly enjoyable movie, addressing issues of perception, persona, and real versus imagined desire. And if Gordon-Levitt capitulates with a Hollywood ending, well, it’s his first movie after all. “Don Jon” promises an interesting career for Gordon-Levitt on both sides of the camera.

Categories
Arts & Life

“Fruitvale Station” lacks factual basis

Andrew Marvin

Contributing Writer

Looking back on a tragedy, we often find ourselves struggling to piece things back together to figure out how and why fate had engineered that moment. “Zero Dark Thirty” opened with an important, engaging piece of the puzzle: audio recordings of people inside the World Trade Center phoning their loved ones. “Fruitvale Station” takes that one step further with actual video footage of a man being brought down, restrained, and shot on the platform of the Fruitvale Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station.

Will this become a trend in movies that label themselves “based on a true story?” I hope not, because that gives the impression that the events portrayed are factual. “Zero Dark Thirty” was certainly not entirely factual, and neither is “Fruitvale Station.” Writer and director Ryan Coogler has stretched the truth so far that only the faint outline of Oscar Grant III’s final day alive remains. Grant was, by all accounts, not a bad man. He is portrayed here as a martyr, a modern Christ figure murdered in cold blood by a racist, gun-waving stereotype of a psychopathic policeman.

If who you are is determined by how you act and what you have done, then Coogler has replaced Grant with a kinder, less-flawed man, and left Grant himself out of the movie. If Coogler had mentioned Grant’s conviction for possession of a handgun and evading arrest, instead of just the drug-dealing charges that his character arc is based off of, would audiences be less inclined to sympathize with him? I doubt it. He was still a defenseless man who was unfairly shot and killed at a young age. Was it necessary to add scenes of him caring for a dying dog or throwing his package of weed into the ocean? As far as anybody knows, he did neither. The proceedings have been drowned in artificial cinematic sweetener.

Likewise, the film also neglects to mention that Johannes Mehserle, the officer who shot Grant, was by no account racist or fascist. He is only on screen for five minutes or so, but his actions are what gave this movie cause to exist, which makes him an important character. It’s worth mentioning that he was not necessarily a bad person. He had never been the subject of a sustained complaint in his time serving as a BART police officer, and he became a father the day after the shooting. Yes, Mehserle shot Grant, but the man on screen who beats and berates Grant is not him. The title cards at the end of the film do not mention any of this, instead focusing on the riots that followed the killing, painting them as an outcry for social justice. There’s even a brief shot of Grant’s real daughter crying at a protest rally.

After the shooting, Mehserle’s family received a number of death threats–his parents, girlfriend, and infant child had to relocate. Where is the social justice there? This is left out of the film. “Fruitvale Station” only portrays the black and white, skipping over all of the shades of gray in between. According to Coogler, Grant is good, Mehserle is bad, and the riots that followed were wholly justified. There is a disturbing lack of both subtlety and intricacy in what he has to say.

“Fruitvale Station” doesn’t portray facts. It’s saccharine-sweet, tear-jerking, heartstring-tugging fiction. It wants to be a victim’s-eye-view of a true crime (complete with a shaky, handheld camera following Grant throughout his day), but is too false to sell itself as such. Though the award-bait performances are all very touching (especially Michael B. Jordan as Grant) none of it feels real. Coogler is a young director, as old as Grant would be now if he were alive. He is filled with potential and doubtlessly talented at emotional manipulation, as demonstrated by this movie. If his next feature is as dishonest as this one, all of that potential will go to waste. “Fruitvale Station” hits the heart, but completely misses the brain.